|
1. How does the University of Chicago, as you know it now, satisfy your desire for a particular kind of learning, community,
and future? Your response should address with some particularity your own wishes and how they relate to Chicago.
Based on my initial research on the University of Chicago, I received the impression that the university was a place where students went to learn for the love of learning, and took classes because they were interested in the subject, not merely because they were required to do so. It also seemed like the kind of university that would promote individual learning, rather than limiting students to established, specialized curricula. In other words, it seemed like the kind of university where my quest for intellectual and academic stimulation and challenge would be fulfilled, where I would not be limited to my main area of study but encouraged to venture into other fields. These initial impressions were confirmed during my overnight visit and interview in January. For the first time in a very long time, I found myself in an environment where every person I spoke to was not only intelligent but interested, and where my "nerdiness" or "geekiness" was seen as a positive trait that even acted as a social catalyst (instead of being a social inhibitor). In fact, during my brief visit, no less than four students told me that I would fit in at the university. Despite having grown up in three countries and having attended three colleges and universities, nobody had ever told me that I would "fit in" anywhere else, nor have I ever felt comfortable being myself as I did at the university. The unique atmosphere also makes the computer sciences program, my intended concentration, at the university more attractive than those offered by most schools. Unlike programs offered in other schools, the University of Chicago program seems to offer more diversity, allowing for more interdisciplinary studies. It is my belief that specialization, especially at the undergraduate level, could have the adverse effect of limiting students' perspectives. Despite the conventional notion of computer sciences as being a highly specialized field, I have found important links with other fields that are often overlooked or simply ignored. For example, while learning Russian, I have started to see the merits of using a well-structured language like Russian in natural language analysis, a topic area important in the study of artificial intelligence. While working in the University Writing Center, I have found many similarities between composition instruction and teaching computer programming. I believe the University of Chicago would offer me a unique environment in which I would not only be allowed, but encouraged to investigate and develop similar such interdisciplinary observations and further my own studies. I also believe the theoretical nature of the computer science courses offered at the university would challenge me, despite my 10 years of practical programming experience, and would further augment my technical abilities. 2. Tell us about a few of your favorite books, poems, authors, films, plays, music, paintings, artists, magazines, or newspapers. Feel free to touch on one, some, or all of the categories listed or add a category of your own. As a computer scientist, one of the categories I feel most strongly towards is software licenses, namely, the Open Source software licensing model. Unlike proprietary software licenses, which cover most commercial software products, Open Source software licenses place importance in quality and freedom over financial gains. Software products licensed using Open Source licenses specifically give users the right to access and modify the source code, or the fundamental building blocks and blue prints of the software. This, in turn, gives users the freedom to change the software as they see fit, or even find and fix security holes. Furthermore, Open Source licenses grant users the right to distribute such improvements to the public as well as the original vendor. Vendors are given the incentive to write better software since, no part of their program can be hidden from the public and all aspects are subject to constant peer review. This level of transparency also makes it difficult for software vendors to manipulate or "lock in" users through unfair practices, essentially allowing for more even playing fields in the industry, further promoting innovation. Over the last year, I have had the opportunity to observe first hand the benefits (and faults) of the Open Source model through one of my own projects. In April 2002, I publicly released one of my software projects, IlohaMail (http://ilohamail.org), free of charge under an Open Source license after having worked on it on my own for nearly two years. Since then, it has been installed on hundreds of servers around the world, and has come to be used by tens of thousands of people. More importantly, volunteers have translated the software into 20 languages, contributed numerous improvements, pointed out security concerns, and have sent me a wide range of suggestions and requests that have helped me further improve the software. Through such collaborative effort, my software has become much more than it possibly could have been, had I continued to work on it alone, or if I had distributed it under a closed license. Through my experiences in the Open Source community, I have also come to realize that the Open Source model is more of a way of thinking than just a licensing or development model. Even though Open Source is not always the ultimate solution, I believe the underlying emphasis on openness, collaboration, and equality may have wider applicability in other areas, such as business and politics, in solving complex issues in often unconventional and unforeseen ways as it has in the software industry. Essay Option 2 Dear Wednesday, Looking back, I must admit that of all the days of the week, you are the one I have always been most sympathetic towards. Unfortunately, it wasn't until recently that I stumbled upon the opportunity to really investigate the extent of my sympathies, and that is my excuse for writing this letter at such late date; after having experienced 1201 Wednesdays. As I'm sure you are aware, the very name "Wednesday" so aptly reflects upon your peculiarities and
qualities. To start off, in English, it is the only day of the week that isn't pronounced the way it is spelled.
But that is no exception. In Russian, the word for Wednesday (pronounced roughly like "celeda") is unlike any
of the other weekdays in that it does not sound even remotely similar to an ordinal. On the other hand,
Russian words for Monday, Tuesday, Thursday, and Friday are somewhat similar to the words for "first",
"second", "fourth" and "fifth" respectively.
One of the main reasons that I am sympathetic towards you, Wednesday, is that I feel you are
under-appreciated and marginalized. To illustrate this, let me describe to you a world in which you,
Wednesday, do not exist. After all, it is sadly our nature to not fully appreciate things we take for granted until
we lose them.
But Wednesday, I, for one, sympathize with you. I've done theatre tech where people only notice when
something goes wrong. I've done tech support, where people call when something doesn't work, but never
when things do work. I'm a programmer and I write software for people who don't even know what
programming is other than that it usually doesn't work. I know what it's like to be unappreciated. But I also
know the silent pride you feel; knowing that you can have talent without glory, power without recognition, and
do good without being appreciated.
Sincerely, |